Falacy of Mainstrem “Christian” Thought

While in a discussion about water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ vs baptism with the use of the terms father , son holy ghost there was disclosed some erroneous thinking pattern.

One dangerous thought is “I would rather take the words of Jesus over the apostles especially Peter”.
Taking this approach you then discredit the entire real new testament which really begins with the testimony of Acts.

See all the books prior to Acts are old Testament and the books Matthew, Mark Luke and John we themselves eyewitness accounts of the LORD Jesus and his actions to testify He is in deed GOD manifested in the flesh.

It was the boot camp phase of the Church.

Now if one refuses to accept the words or instructions of Peter or Paul in acts regarding baptism then one can not accept the rest of the letters written by Paul, Peter or John on any other subject and in taken
this action one calls them a lier and if indeed they lied they would be in the Lake of Fire with the devil in sted of having their names placed on twelve pillars of heaven.

The other problem this places then is then is the way we should conduct ourself while being a Christian and the book of Revelation.
If only the “red letter edition is accepted then the Book of Acts through Revelation is no longer relevant.

If something as relevant as water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ is denied then the homosexuals have their say as well.

Dis you know that all scripture is inspired by GOD and written by men whom the LORD inspired?
Did you also know that the LORD himself never wrote a book , penned a letter?
So the words we read of what was said is a testament of the LORDS Actions.
Acts of the apostles the short version is a testament a eyewitness account of the actions done by the real church in the beginning.
Deny acts one denies the LORD Jesus;
to deny the authority of the Apostles is to deny the authority of the LORD or even one of the five fold ministry in this case ones pastor.